Corrections

We maintain a policy of correcting errors on theloiterpoint rather than deleting or silently altering published reference pages. When a substantive correction is made, a note is appended to the foot of the article stating the nature of the correction and the date it was applied. This ensures a transparent record for all readers.

A substantive correction is one that alters a factual claim central to the article’s purpose, such as an incorrect regulatory detail, an inaccurate technical specification for a drone model, or a wrong airspace classification. Minor typographical errors or formatting issues that do not change factual meaning are corrected without a note.

To report a potential error, please provide the full web address of the article and the exact claim you believe requires correction, along with a credible source for the correct information. This allows for efficient verification. We aim to review reported errors and implement any necessary corrections within five working days.

The factual reference pages on theloiterpoint, covering areas from jurisdiction rules to airport information, are also updated when the world changes. This occurs when new regulations come into force, airspace designations are amended, or drone manufacturers issue critical revisions to published specifications. Such updates are not corrections of previous errors but reflect a change in the underlying facts; they are typically dated within the article text itself.

Our commitment is to provide accurate, current reference material for the North American drone operator. The correction policy and update practice are fundamental to that aim, ensuring the site remains a reliable resource for information on airframes, rules, and the operational environment.